JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 14, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Sandra Milena Mendoza·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Primera Instancia
  • Debe adoptar medidas necesarias para que el fallo se cumpla y conocer de incidentes de desacato por desconocimiento de órdenes dadas
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia de la referencia.

Se recuerda que el cumplimiento de las acciones proferidas por esta Corporación deben ser tramitadas ante el juez de primera instancia, por lo tanto se decide remitir el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga,

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. OFICIAR al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga, Sala de Decisión Penal, para que realice las gestiones que garanticen el cumplimiento de la Sentencia T-755 de 2009 proferida por la Sala Sexta de Revisión e informe a esta Corporación, en un término que no podrá ser superior a veinte (20) días contados a partir de la notificación del presente auto, las actuaciones adelantadas para dicho fin.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR copia del presente auto al peticionario de la solicitud de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.